vinniebatman

...

I'm speechless.  I get Kripke refusing to have the show for for more than 5 seasons.  It's a good idea to have it all planned out so the show doesn't end up with two crappy final seasons.

But seriously, Paris Hilton?

That just... my soul... she cries.

Though there is this:

A source close to the show says, "The fans should trust [creator/producer] Eric Kripke."

I'll trust you, Kripke.  But don't let me down.

And keep her away from the boys.  She might... soil... them.

Link to blurb of DOOOOM here.

Found this link on thesuperficial.com.


Now this is just fucking creepy....

Tom Cruise Talks About Scientology

::whimpers::
LJ is scaring me again.  I don't think anything I've written would be considered bad by them, but it still freaks me out.
So, on the chance that they delete my friends, please let me know if you have an Insane Journal or Greatest Journal account, and if so, what the name is.
I'd like to keep up on where my friends are at.

Okay, so you don't like a story?  Keep it to yourself!
I post a lot of my stories, even non-crossovers, on Twisting the Hellmouth because there are a few writers on there who like to read all of my writing, not just crossovers.  
I recently wrote a story/ficlet called "Bleed for You," which was mostly about Wesley angsting about his attraction for Angel and all the ways he'd screwed things up.
But this is the review I got for it:  How about you mark this slash so those of us who don't like OOC buttsecks can use the slash-block function to pretend it doesn't exsist.
On TtH, there is a function, a button you can check that will label it as a "Story contains sexual activity between two (or more) male characters."
But there wasn't any sexual content for christ's sake!  It was angsting, which is why I didn't mark it as slash.
So I sent the following response to the person:
"I apologize for the fact that you inadvertantly were forced to read my "OOC buttsecks" even though there was no slash interaction or sex in the story.
I purposely chose not to use said function as it is to be used for "Story contains sexual activity between two (or more) male characters."  It didn't.  I dealt with sexual attraction on the part of one male, not both. However, I felt I more than made up for it in the fact that my description clearly stated that the story would be dealing with Wesley having loving feelings for Angel.
So apparently you'll just have to do what so many reads do: read the description and use it to decided whether or not you want to read the story, and if you'll agree with the pairing."

I know it will just make it worse, but seriously, they're supposed to be reading fic, so is it that hard to read a description and use their brain?!  So, in an attempt to clarify this for my own piece of mind, and because I don't actually want to break any rules, I posted a question on the forum, and according to one of the moderators: 

"Sounds to me like your interpreting everything correctly.  A simple rule of thumb is: if the pairing was girl/boy would you tick the hetero sex warning box?"

So I feel validated, although now I wish I could delete that comment.

At first I was pissed, but I'll admit it.  Now I'm just damn smug.